Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41400922›Full record

ArticleThe Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association2026

Proxy- and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Cleft Lip and/or Palate Under 8 Years of Age: A Scoping Review.

Kariym Joachim, Alexandra D'Souza, Jessie Howard, Aaron M Drucker, Christopher R Forrest, Karen W Y Wong Riff

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kariym JoachimInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0939-9201
Alexandra D'SouzaDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, Canada.
Jessie HowardDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, Canada.
Aaron M DruckerDivision of Dermatology; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Christopher R ForrestInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0009-0003-4959-0320
Karen W Y Wong RiffDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveThis scoping review aimed to identify patient-reported outcome (PRO) and proxy-report outcome (ProxRO) measures administered to children under 8 years of age with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) and to describe the age at which proxy or self-report measures were used.DesignScoping ReviewSettingWhen children are unable to self-report, PROs and ProxROs can be used. The age at which proxy-report is appropriate has not been described in patients with CL/P.Patients, ParticipantsChildren born with CL/P.InterventionsOvid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Register, and Web of Science were searched from inception until July 2024. Title and abstract screening, full text review, and data extraction were done independently in duplicate. Measures were categorized as PROs, ProxROs, or "MultiROs," where both caregivers and children responded. A narrative synthesis was performed to describe the identified measures.Main Outcome MeasuresPRO or ProxRO measures in children with CL/P less than 8 years old.ResultsOf 7001 publications identified, 57 studies met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-six measures were identified, of which 43 had at least 1 published psychometric property. Thirteen studies used ad hoc measures. Most measures were not condition-specific to CL/P. ProxROs were more commonly utilized than PROs. Parent-proxy tools were used from birth to 8 years, while self-report was used in patients as young as 3 years old.ConclusionsThere is a paucity of cleft-specific ProxRO measures that assess outcomes of cleft care in patients under 8 years of age. Work to develop and validate ProxRO measures for CL/P is needed.

Indexed as

Cleft LipCleft PalatePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProxyChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantcleft lipcleft palateoutcomespediatricsquality of lifesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41400922
PMCPMC13542404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.