ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2025
Development and Evaluation of A PC-Compatible E-Learning System for Mammography and Breast Ultrasound.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improving mammography and ultrasound interpretation skills requires exposure to a large number of images. However, mammography images, particularly those stored in the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format, are increasingly high-resolution and large, making them difficult to handle in personal computer (PC) environments. We developed a system that compresses mammography images while preserving quality and enables simultaneous learning with corresponding breast ultrasound images. Since 2022, this platform has been utilized by the Breast Cancer Screening Subcommittee for online learning to review the previous year’s screening images. Participants evaluated image quality on a 5-point scale. Using 2022 as a control, the Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare image quality across 2023 and 2024. Participants also evaluated their perceived improvement (1–5 scale), and the Mann–Whitney test was applied to compare 2023 and 2024 data. File size was reduced to 3–13% of the original. Overall, 96% of participants were satisfied with image quality, and 75% of returning participants reported improved diagnostic skills. Although differences in image quality (p = 0.09) and diagnostic skill improvement (p = 0.167) were not significant, 98% expressed interest in continuing web-based training. This study is the first to report a system enabling screening professionals to review mammographic and ultrasound images they previously interpreted using a home PC. The findings suggest that a PC-based, remotely accessible e-learning environment offers greater convenience and comparable educational value to in-person workshops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41400893What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.