SynthesisJournal of religion and health2026
Religiosity and Organ Donation: A Meta-Analysis of Attitudes, Willingness, and Registration Status.
Synthesis in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Existing research examining the relationship between religiosity and organ donation has produced inconsistent results. To address this ambiguity, the current study adopts meta-analysis to synthesize findings from 18 studies examining associations between religiosity and two categories of organ donation variables: psychological indicators (attitudes toward donation and intentions to register) and registration outcomes (actual donor registration status). Two separate random-effects meta-analyses were conducted, indicating that religiosity was not significantly associated with psychological outcomes (k = 15), yet demonstrated a significant negative impact on actual organ donor registration behaviors (k = 5). A random-effects meta-regression further assessed potential moderators including age, gender, country context, and data collection type, none of which meaningfully explained variability in the observed effect sizes. Evidence of publication bias was identified, suggesting the current results may underestimate the negative magnitude of religiosity's impact on organ donation. Our findings underscore the attitude-registration discrepancy, highlighting the importance of clergy clearly communicating guidance regarding organ donation. Further theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41400816What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.