ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026
Kidney stabilization in supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: impact on surgical efficiency and stone-free rates.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kidney mobility during supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (sPCNL) may negatively affect the accuracy of the approach and surgical efficacy. This study investigated the effects of kidney stabilization on surgical efficacy, stone-free rate (SFR), and complication profile. Eighty-five patients who underwent standard sPCNL for ≥ 2 cm kidney stones between January and August 2025 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: conventional sPCNL (Group C, n = 41) and sPCNL with external gel bag for kidney stabilization (Group F, n = 44). Demographic and stone characteristics, operative time, access time, fluoroscopy time, hemoglobin drop, transfusion rates, length of stay (LOS), complications, and SFR were compared. The groups were similar in terms of demographic and stone characteristics. In Group F, the operative time (74.7 ± 32.2 vs. 97.5 ± 38.0 min, p = 0.004), access time, and fluoroscopy time were significantly shorter (p < 0.001 for both). LOS was shorter in Group F (2.3 vs. 3.1 days, p = 0.001). Hemoglobin decline was less in Group F (1.20 ± 0.81 vs. 1.78 ± 1.31 g/dL, p = 0.017). Transfusion and major complication rates were similar. SFR was significantly higher in Group F (88.6% vs. 70.7%, p = 0.030). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that kidney stabilization was an independent predictor of achieving stone-free status (p = 0.032). Kidney stabilization reduces mobility during sPCNL, thereby shortening operative and fluoroscopy times, reducing blood loss, and improving SFR. These retrospective findings suggest that this simple technique may enhance surgical efficiency; however, its clinical value should be confirmed in prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41400790What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.