ArticleJournal of community genetics2025
Case-based genomics education and training of neurologists: an Egyptian initiative.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many physicians lack confidence in providing genetic services to patients due to a lack of genetic/genomic knowledge. The study aimed to develop and implement a genomic education and training program for neurologists, a real initiative activity. The program consisted of three steps: (1) conducting an exploratory survey to identify knowledge gaps, attitudes, and concerns related to medical genetics/genomics in practical settings. (2) Designing the framework and implementing the national initiative program. (3) Preliminary evaluation of the program outcomes. The program was conducted as part of postgraduate education at a university hospital. Survey responses (42.5%) indicated that many neurologists expressed the importance of genomic medicine but lacked confidence in applying genomic tests in practice and addressing patient questions about genetic diseases. They expressed a preference for face-to-face learning, including case discussions and interpretation of genetic test results. The initiative comprised seven courses conducted over 24 months, with a total of 42 regular meetings. It involved three academic consultant neurologists as expert educators and 45 junior neurologists as trainees. Case discussions and interpretation of authentic genomic results were conducted for 46 patients. Evaluation of the initiative by trainees was promising. Neurologists reported increased genomic knowledge and felt more comfortable referring patients for genetic testing after receiving guidance from expert peers. Findings indicate that neurologists seek scalable and ongoing genomic education and training tailored to their field. Face-to-face, case-based learning led by expert educators in genomics, focusing on neurology, appears to be the most effective approach to address gaps in genomic education and training.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.