ReviewCurrent oncology reports2025
Pharmacological Treatment for Adamantinomatous Craniopharyngioma.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewAdamantinomatous craniopharyngioma (ACP) is a histologically benign but clinically aggressive tumor arising from Rathke's pouch remnants, which is molecularly distinct from the other subtype, papillary craniopharyngioma (PCP). Despite advancements in surgery and radiotherapy, treatment outcomes remain unsatisfactory due to the tumor's invasiveness and resistance to conventional therapies. This review systematically examines the molecular pathogenesis of ACP and evaluates current and emerging therapeutic strategies to improve clinical management. RECENT
findingsACP is driven by CTNNB1 mutations and dysregulated Wnt/β-catenin signaling, alongside inflammatory and senescence-associated pathways. Current pharmacological approaches, including interferon-α, IL-6 inhibitors (e.g., tocilizumab), and intracystic agents (e.g., bleomycin), exhibit limited efficacy. Promising emerging therapies target the angiogenesis (e.g., bevacizumab) and MAPK/ERK pathway, which is activated by somatic BRAF V600E mutations in PCP, has been successfully targeted with BRAF/MEK inhibitors, demonstrating significant efficacy in the majority of treated PCP patients. whereas immune checkpoint inhibitors and SHH pathway modulators face significant challenges. Additionally, ACP-related endocrine dysfunction and hypothalamic obesity require tailored interventions, such as GLP-1 receptor agonists and MC4R-targeted therapies. Precision medicine, informed by molecular subtyping and multi-omics data, holds transformative potential for ACP treatment. Future strategies should focus on combinatorial therapies to address tumor heterogeneity, microenvironment modulation, and senolytic approaches. Collaborative multidisciplinary efforts are crucial to translating these insights into clinical practice, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41400734What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.