Trial reportClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026
Early palliative care in heart failure shows neutral effects across EF subtypes: an exploratory EPCHF secondary analysis.
Trial report in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionEarly integration of palliative care (EIPC) has been proposed to improve quality of life in heart failure (HF), but evidence is mixed and potential differences by HF subtype remain unclear. This exploratory secondary analysis of the EPCHF trial examined whether patient-reported outcomes differed between patients with and without reduced EF.
methodsA total of 205 patients with symptomatic HF were randomized 1:1 to EIPC or standard care in the EPCHF trial. For this exploratory analysis, patients were stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (≤ 40% vs > 40%). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed over 12 months using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care (FACIT-PAL), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), MIDOS, and FACIT-SP12.
resultsKCCQ scores, HADS-anxiety, and MIDOS symptom intensity improved significantly over 12 months in both EIPC and control groups, with no significant between-group differences in either EF subgroup. Reductions in HADS-depression occurred only in patients with HFrEF, with similar improvements in both EIPC (-1.37; 95% CI: -2.31 to -0.44; p = 0.004) and control (-1.99; 95% CI: -2.89 to -1.09; p < 0.001). Among patients with LVEF > 40%, EIPC produced a significant improvement in spiritual well-being compared with standard care (mean difference 3.47; 95% CI: 0.32 to 6.62; p = 0.031), whereas the control group showed no improvement. Mortality and hospitalization rates did not differ between groups.
conclusionIn this exploratory EF-stratified analysis of EPCHF trial, EIPC did not improve overall HRQOL, mood, or symptom burden compared with standard care. A significant effect was observed only for spiritual well-being in patients with LVEF > 40%, suggesting that this subgroup may have distinct supportive-care needs warranting further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41400671What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.