ArticleChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[New security threats in Europe: how prepared is German surgery for victims of war and violence?]
Article in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Visceral surgery in mass casualty incidents due to disasters, crises and war].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Russian invasion of Ukraine has confronted Germany with the realities of military conflict, including the medical care of seriously injured soldiers and civilians brought in through humanitarian efforts. This raises concerns about the preparedness of the German healthcare system for such scenarios, particularly in terms of personnel and structural resources for the treatment of penetrating injuries, which are typical for the military context. MATERIAL AND
methodsAn online survey was distributed via email to members of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV). Respondents were asked about structural prerequisites in emergency care capabilities at their institutions and personal experiences managing penetrating trunk injuries (n = 411; 94.6% from civilian hospitals).
resultsDespite increasing specialization 34% of visceral surgeons reported performing emergency thoracotomy themselves. Access to a thoracic surgeon is available in only 50% of the hospitals and to a cardiac surgeon in 26%. The majority of respondents felt inadequately prepared to manage penetrating injuries, especially those resembling military trauma patterns (e.g., shrapnel, blast injuries) as opposed to civilian gunshot wounds.
conclusionGiven these findings and the evolving geopolitical and security landscape, basic military surgical knowledge must be more broadly disseminated and systematically integrated into national emergency preparedness and disaster response frameworks in order to strengthen the capability for treatment in exceptional situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41400664What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.