ReviewAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026
Rhythm Processing Across Development: Origins, Links to Language Processing, and Perspectives for Intervention.
Review in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rhythm Processing Across Development: Origins, Links to Language Processing, and Perspectives for Intervention.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A wealth of research has investigated rhythm processing in music and speech, revealing shared cognitive and neural correlates and potential transfer effects, as evidenced by shared benefits and shared processing difficulties, as well as effects of stimulation and training programs. In this review article, we first discuss the empirical evidence of rhythm processing in adults and children and highlight the need to extend this investigation to early infancy. We next summarize new experimental evidence of rhythm processing in early infancy, with a focus on prematurely born infants who provide a model of early neurodevelopment. Finally, we present two longitudinal studies as concrete examples for investigating rhythm processing in healthy full-term infants for nonverbal and speech materials and its tracking over development (here up to 5 years). Altogether, this review aims to motivate new research investigating interindividual differences in rhythm processing in early infancy, along with implications for typical and atypical developmental contexts and potential diagnostic value. It provides evidence for the potential benefit of early rhythm-based training interventions, which may decrease the cascading effects of early atypical rhythm processing during development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.