ArticleBiology of reproduction2026
Long-term tamoxifen impacts the ovary but not preimplantation embryo development†.
Article in Biology of reproduction, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many studies have examined the acute effects of chemotherapies and radiation on the ovary; however, few address the impact of long-term chemotherapeutic agents on future reproduction for cancer survivors. The purpose of our study was to determine the effect of long-term tamoxifen (TAM) treatment on follicle development, ovarian reserve, and embryogenesis in a murine model. Adult female mice were treated with TAM (250 mg/kg fed ad libitum in mouse chow) or control chow for three weeks, followed by 0-, 1-, or 3-weeks of TAM washout. Mice were then superovulated, mated, and their oviducts flushed to determine ovulation, fertilization, and in vitro embryo development rates. At specific timepoints, one ovary from each animal was harvested, sectioned, and stained with H&E, while the other ovary was evaluated for gene expression of targeted genes. Ovarian size was calculated based on average surface area over six slices. Follicles (primordial, primary, secondary, antral / pre-ovulatory), and corpora lutea (CL) were counted and averaged for each slice. All data were analyzed using mixed-effects analysis of variance (ANOVA), with treatment group as the fixed effect and ovary treated as a random effect nested within treatment. Ovaries of TAM treated mice were 36% smaller on average than control ovaries (P = 0.01). Primordial follicle counts were 35% lower than control ovaries (P = 0.007) and there were 3.4x more atretic follicles in the ovaries of TAM treated mice (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the number of primary, secondary, antral or pre-ovulatory follicles. The number of oocytes and embryos flushed from control mice (total ovulated) was 1.65x greater than TAM treated mice. However, fertilization rates and in vitro embryo blastulation rates were not significantly different between controls and TAM groups. In summary, for this murine model, long-term TAM negatively impacted ovarian reserve (primordial follicle number) without overtly affecting the in vitro embryo development to the blastocyst.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.