Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41400344›Full record

ArticleSuicide & life-threatening behavior2025

Thinking About Suicide for a Long Time: A Scoping Review of Empirical Studies on Persistent Suicidal Ideation.

Lena Spangenberg, Tobias Teismann, Inken Höller

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Suicide & life-threatening behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lena SpangenbergDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8248-6734
Tobias TeismannMental Health Research and Treatment Center, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6498-7356
Inken HöllerDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Charlotte Fresenius Hochschule, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6572-1421

Funding

Supported by the Open Access Publication Fund of Leipzig University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPersistent suicidal ideation (PSI) represents a clinically relevant phenomenon that remains insufficiently understood. The aim of this scoping review was to provide an overview of empirical studies investigating PSI, with a focus on definitions, operationalizations, and associations with indicators of mental health, suicidal behaviors, and treatment approaches. MATERIALS AND

methodsFollowing established guidelines for conducting scoping reviews, a systematic search of the literature was conducted, and studies were screened according to predefined inclusion criteria.

resultsN = 44 articles reporting on n = 40 individual studies were included in this review. The results indicate that several empirical studies have addressed PSI, most commonly using longitudinal designs. However, the absence of a consistent conceptualization across studies led to diverse and heterogeneous operationalizations and partly contradictory findings, making synthesis difficult. DISCUSSION: A major limitation of this review lies in the inconsistent terminology across publications, which may have resulted in missed studies. Furthermore, case studies and theoretical works were excluded, narrowing the scope of the findings.

conclusionThe clinical relevance of PSI contrasts with the lack of empirical findings addressing its epidemiological and phenomenological characteristics. Future research should establish a common definition and operational criteria for PSI.

Indexed as

Suicidal IdeationSuicideHumanschronic suicidal ideationchronic suicide‐related thoughts and behaviorspersistent suicide‐related thoughts and behaviorsscoping reviewsuicidal ideation

Identifiers

PMID41400344
PMCPMC12707180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.