ArticleJournal of vision2025
Do you see what I see? Linking involuntary nonretinal (phantom) vision and mental imagery in aphantasia.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent theories propose that, like endogenous and exogenous visual attention, voluntary and involuntary forms of phantom vision (e.g., mental imagery and dreams) are related and hence depend on overlapping mechanisms. However, the relationship between voluntary and involuntary phantom vision remains largely unknown. Here, we assess this relationship by examining how voluntary visual imagery relates to involuntary forms of phantom vision (specifically, visual illusions) in a unique population with no voluntary visual imagery (aphantasia). In our first study, we presented individuals with aphantasia with seven different visual illusions (Hermann grid, Ponzo illusion, Kanizsa triangles, Ebbinghaus illusion, watercolor effect, neon color-spreading, and rotating snakes). Compared to both a large group of undergraduates and an age-matched control sample, the only illusion in which individuals with aphantasia reported a significant reduction was the neon color illusion. In a large online follow-up study, we used the method of adjustment to obtain a more precise measure of the neon color-spreading illusion in individuals with aphantasia and those with visual imagery. We found that this measure of neon color was lower in those with aphantasia than in those with visual imagery, as were their subjective ratings of the illusion. Importantly, there were no differences between the groups for catch/mock neon color "illusion" trials or a separate color adjustment task. Together, these data provide evidence that individuals with aphantasia experience the neon color illusion at a lower intensity, supporting the hypothesis that some forms of voluntary and involuntary phantom vision depend on overlapping mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.