ArticleJournal of experimental botany2026
Streamlining the isolation of fungal hyphae: a semi-automated approach for soil substrates.
Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emerging themes and technologies in multi-organismal approaches to understanding mycorrhizal functioning.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extracting fungal hyphae with their naturally associated microbiota from soil samples presents a significant challenge due to their small size, typically in the micrometer range, and the formation of dynamic fungal networks. We combined elements of previous protocols and automated the wet-sieving steps of the methodology to efficiently extract fungal hyphae from various soil types, including natural loamy soils. This approach reduces manual handling, minimizes operator-dependent variability, and shortens processing time by up to 2.5-fold. Unlike earlier methods that require sand or glass bead supplementation, which can introduce artificial conditions and limit large-scale field applications, our sieving and sucrose centrifugation (SSC) method avoids these drawbacks. The SSC technique both enables quantification of hyphal length density (HLD) and, importantly, preserves surface-associated microbes for downstream analyses. Among the tested methods, SSC yielded the highest HLD. Using a combination of microscopy, molecular techniques, and next-generation sequencing (NGS), we demonstrate that this method allows targeted study of bacteria tightly attached to fungal hyphae. Furthermore, the SSC approach effectively enriched fungal hyphae from a highly diverse soil community, establishing a dependable tool for advancing research on fungal hyphae as microbial hotspots in soil ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.