ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026
Discovery of Tetrahydroisoquinoline-Based SARS-CoV-2 Helicase Inhibitors with Iterative, Deep Learning-Enhanced Virtual Screening.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discovery of two novel small-molecule series with potent SARS-CoV-2 inhibitionChemical science · 2026Article
- Drugs against broad-spectrum of coronaviruses.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we pursued a structure-based drug discovery campaign targeting the SARS-CoV-2 helicase through three rounds of virtual screening (VS) enhanced with Artificial Intelligence (AI). The third round incorporated a deep neural network (DNN) in a virtual screening protocol to prioritize commercial molecules containing fragments related to previously identified hits. This model predicted binary activity toward the target and contributed to a 21% improvement in hit-identification efficiency compared with the previous approach, which used the same virtual screening protocol. In total, we have identified at least six hits with selectivity indexes (CC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.