Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41400111›Full record

ReviewFEBS letters2026

Analytical methods and tools for studying inositol phosphates.

Masatoshi Ito, Shinichi Koguchi, Adolfo Saiardi, Eiichiro Nagata

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEBS letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Masatoshi ItoDepartment of Neurology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2665-0020
Shinichi KoguchiDepartment of Chemistry, Tokai University School of Science, Hiratsuka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4564-3961
Adolfo SaiardiLaboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4351-0081
Eiichiro NagataDepartment of Neurology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6902-8309

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP24K13557Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP25K10758UKRI Medical Research Council MR/T028904/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite numerous studies, the biological and medical significance of inositol phosphates (InsPs) remains to be fully elucidated. One of the primary rate-limiting factors for InsP research is the difficulty in developing a method to specifically detect these molecules in complex biological matrices. Recent remarkable advancements in analytical chemistry such as nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and pertinent separation technologies have allowed the selective and sensitive differentiation of InsPs depending on the number and/or position of phosphate groups bound to the inositol ring. Thus, knowledge and experience of analytical chemistry have increasingly become a prerequisite for InsP studies. Establishing synthetic processes for functional InsPs and their analogs by organic chemists has also provided effective tools for quantitating their absolute abundances, as well as for investigating their molecular functions. This review briefly recapitulates the historical trajectory of the methodology applied to InsP research and highlights recently developed protocols using mass spectrometry coupled with liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis, in addition to a simple description of the chemical and chemoenzymatic synthesis of InsPs and their analogs.

Indexed as

Inositol PhosphatesAnimalsChromatography, LiquidElectrophoresis, CapillaryHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMass SpectrometryInositol Phosphatescapillary electrophoresis–mass spectrometryinositol phosphateinositol pyrophosphateisotope labelingliquid chromatography–mass spectrometrymass spectrometryphosphoramidite chemistry

Identifiers

PMID41400111
PMCPMC13573072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.