ReviewFEBS letters2026
Analytical methods and tools for studying inositol phosphates.
Review in FEBS letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Phosphoinositides and inositol phosphates-functions and cellular dynamics.FEBS letters · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite numerous studies, the biological and medical significance of inositol phosphates (InsPs) remains to be fully elucidated. One of the primary rate-limiting factors for InsP research is the difficulty in developing a method to specifically detect these molecules in complex biological matrices. Recent remarkable advancements in analytical chemistry such as nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and pertinent separation technologies have allowed the selective and sensitive differentiation of InsPs depending on the number and/or position of phosphate groups bound to the inositol ring. Thus, knowledge and experience of analytical chemistry have increasingly become a prerequisite for InsP studies. Establishing synthetic processes for functional InsPs and their analogs by organic chemists has also provided effective tools for quantitating their absolute abundances, as well as for investigating their molecular functions. This review briefly recapitulates the historical trajectory of the methodology applied to InsP research and highlights recently developed protocols using mass spectrometry coupled with liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis, in addition to a simple description of the chemical and chemoenzymatic synthesis of InsPs and their analogs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.