ReviewHepatology (Baltimore, Md.)2026
Response evaluation to systemic therapy in HCC: Current challenges and future perspectives.
Review in Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A GIMAP family signature for prognostic prediction and immune characterization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Response-survival Association Differs by Hepatic Reserve in Unresectable HCC Receiving Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In oncology, the radiological assessment of treatment response is crucial for predicting therapeutic efficacy in terms of survival, both in clinical trials and daily practice. However, this fundamental principle is often challenged in the context of HCC, where cirrhosis-related phenomena complicate radiological evaluation and impact patient prognosis beyond the oncological disease itself. In addition, the introduction of new therapeutic agents into the rapidly evolving landscape of systemic treatment further complicates this task, raising significant concerns about the validity of commonly used response criteria in this setting. Here, we aim to provide a critical view of tumor response evaluation to systemic therapy in HCC. First, we review the main treatment response criteria to systemic therapy, emphasizing the differences and limitations of RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST. Second, we delve into the challenges of radiological evaluation both in clinical trials and daily practice, with a particular focus on emerging approaches currently under investigation, such as immunotherapy-based downstaging and conversion therapy. Finally, we discuss emerging trends and future directions in radiological assessment techniques, including 3D imaging, artificial intelligence, and radiomics, and their potential impact on refining treatment evaluation in the era of precision oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.