Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41399945›Full record

ReviewHepatology (Baltimore, Md.)2026

Response evaluation to systemic therapy in HCC: Current challenges and future perspectives.

Mario Matute-González, Maxime Ronot, Victoria Chernyak, Bruno Sangro, Jordi Rimola

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mario Matute-GonzálezBCLC Group, Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4533-9345
Maxime RonotDepartment of Radiology, Hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP Nord, Clichy, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7464-3939
Victoria ChernyakDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5715-1403
Bruno SangroLiver Unit and HPB Oncology Area, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4177-6417
Jordi RimolaBCLC Group, Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1814-4198

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In oncology, the radiological assessment of treatment response is crucial for predicting therapeutic efficacy in terms of survival, both in clinical trials and daily practice. However, this fundamental principle is often challenged in the context of HCC, where cirrhosis-related phenomena complicate radiological evaluation and impact patient prognosis beyond the oncological disease itself. In addition, the introduction of new therapeutic agents into the rapidly evolving landscape of systemic treatment further complicates this task, raising significant concerns about the validity of commonly used response criteria in this setting. Here, we aim to provide a critical view of tumor response evaluation to systemic therapy in HCC. First, we review the main treatment response criteria to systemic therapy, emphasizing the differences and limitations of RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST. Second, we delve into the challenges of radiological evaluation both in clinical trials and daily practice, with a particular focus on emerging approaches currently under investigation, such as immunotherapy-based downstaging and conversion therapy. Finally, we discuss emerging trends and future directions in radiological assessment techniques, including 3D imaging, artificial intelligence, and radiomics, and their potential impact on refining treatment evaluation in the era of precision oncology.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsHumansImmunotherapyPrognosisTreatment Outcomeartificial intelligenceimmunotherapyliver cancerradiologyradiomicsRECISTsurrogate endpoints

Identifiers

PMID41399945
PMCPMC13585167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.