ArticleMolecular therapy. Oncology2025
Efficacy and safety of BRAF-MEK inhibitors in treatment of Chinese patients with papillary craniopharyngioma: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Molecular therapy. Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular therapy for papillary craniopharyngioma: a multi-institutional analysis of practice patterns across the RAPID Consortium.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous research supports the efficacy of BRAF-MEK inhibitor therapy for papillary craniopharyngiomas (PCPs). This retrospective study of 30 Chinese PCP patients evaluated tumor response and safety outcomes during treatment. All patients maintained 100% progression-free and overall survival throughout the follow-up. Tumor measurements revealed consistent reductions over time, with maximum diameter decreasing by 45.81% (31.01%-66.67%) at 1 month, 56.26% (46.67%-66.67%) at 3 months, and 59.50% (46.84%-69.94%) at the final follow-up. Similar patterns emerged for both solid and cystic components. Notably, neoadjuvant therapy demonstrated superior efficacy (60.35% reduction) compared to adjuvant approaches (42.90% reduction) at 1 month, particularly for solid tumor portions. Adverse events occurred more frequently during the initial 3-month period. These findings highlight the clinical value of BRAF-MEK inhibitor combinations for PCP treatment while suggesting potential limitations of extended targeted therapy duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.