ArticleJournal of pain research2025
Real-World Effectiveness and Tolerability of Low Dose Naltrexone to Treat Chronic Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study of One Pain Physician's Practice.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low-Dose Naltrexone: What is the Evidence? A Narrative Review.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Low-Dose Naltrexone in Chronic Pain Management: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Clinical Implications.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Low-dose naltrexone (LDN) is an off-label treatment for chronic pain, with evidence supporting its use mainly consisting of small-scale studies. This retrospective cohort review aimed to contribute to this growing body of literature and evaluate the real-world effectiveness of LDN across a range of chronic pain conditions in a single physician's practice. Patients and Methods: A total of 128 patients prescribed LDN between September 2021 and June 2024 were reviewed independently by two investigators, with 93 meeting inclusion criteria. Patients were categorized into 12 groups based on diagnosis, with fibromyalgia representing the largest subgroup (27 patients). Retrospective cohort data was collected and included patient demographics, adverse effects, dosage, duration of therapy, and reported symptom relief. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze findings. Results: Subjective symptom relief was reported by 53.8% of patients, most commonly improvements in pain (49 patients) and fatigue (25 patients), when taking LDN. The highest response rates were seen in patients with mast cell activation syndromes and arthritis-related conditions (71.4%). Adverse effects occurred in 49.5% of patients, most frequently nausea and fatigue. No serious adverse effects were reported. Conclusion: These findings suggest that LDN may be an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for a range of chronic pain conditions. Further studies, such as randomized controlled trials, are warranted to confirm these results and optimize dosing strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.