ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025
Case Report: Pitfalls in CF screening - targeted variant analysis can cause misleading results and therapy recommendations.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is primarily diagnosed in Germany through newborn screening (NS) using immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT)/Pancreatitis-Associated Protein (PAP) measurements and genetic testing for common CFTR gene variants. While this method is effective in identifying the most frequent mutations, it may overlook complex alleles, which can impact phenotype and treatment efficacy. Case Presentation: We report the case of a five-year-old girl diagnosed with CF through NS, initially identified as homozygous for the F508del variant. Despite early Orkambi therapy, her response was suboptimal, with high sweat chloride levels and recurrent respiratory infections. Re-sequencing with a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel revealed an additional undetected heterozygous pathogenic variant. Upon switching to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI), sweat chloride levels significantly improved. Conclusion: Standard genetic screening methods may fail to detect complex alleles, leading to misinterpretation of genotype and suboptimal treatment choices. This case highlights the necessity of comprehensive genetic analysis in patients with unexpected therapy responses. When CFTR modulator therapy does not yield the expected improvements, re-sequencing should be considered to optimize precision medicine approaches for CF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.