ArticlePreventive medicine reports2025
Improving preventive screening efficiency: A population-based model of age-specific mammographic density for breast Cancer detection in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Current age-based breast cancer screening protocols may not be optimally effective as they overlook mammographic density as a key risk factor. This study developed a personalized risk stratification model by analyzing age-specific mammographic density patterns to improve screening accuracy and reduce false-positive rates. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was performed on mammographic data from 2584 women aged 32-90 years from October 2023-December 2024. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) density classifications were analyzed using polynomial regression and changepoint analysis to identify critical age thresholds. Four age-density clusters were derived, and a gradient boosting model was developed to evaluate predictive accuracy. Results: The analysis identified three significant age thresholds (42.3, 51.7, and 65.2 years) where mammographic density patterns shifted. Four risk clusters were established, and the model achieved high predictive accuracy (Area Under the Curve [AUC] = 0.83). Simulations projected that personalized screening protocols could increase cancer detection by 14.7 % and reduce false positives by 9.7 % compared to traditional age-only approaches. Conclusions: Age-specific mammographic density screening offers a data-driven method to advance breast cancer prevention. It provides a framework for developing more effective screening policies that can decrease morbidity, supporting a shift toward risk-based screening as standard care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.