Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41399698›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025

Improving reirradiation of recurrent non-small cell lung cancer through non-coplanar beam arrangements.

Nathan Torelli, Jonas Willmann, Katja Dähler, Madalyne Day, Nicolaus Andratschke, Jan Unkelbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nathan TorelliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jonas WillmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Katja DählerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Madalyne DayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nicolaus AndratschkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jan UnkelbachDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Reirradiation for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is commonly delivered using coplanar techniques. In this study, we investigated whether the selection of favorable non-coplanar beam orientations may limit cumulative doses to critical organs-at-risk (OARs) and thus improve the therapeutic window. Materials and methods: Fifteen cases of challenging high-dose reirradiation for locoregionally recurrent NSCLC were included in this in-silico study. For each patient, the dose distribution from the previous treatment was first mapped to the new patient anatomy using rigid dose registration, and subsequently converted to equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2). A two-arc non-coplanar reirradiation plan was then generated using an EQD2-based direct aperture optimization algorithm, which allows for the simultaneous optimization of dynamic gantry-couch paths and the cumulative EQD2 distribution. Non-coplanar reirradiation plans were benchmarked against two-arc coplanar plans. Results: Considerable reductions of at least 5 Gy in the maximum cumulative EQD2 to critical organs were achieved in 6 out of 15 patients using non-coplanar versus coplanar arcs. In particular, the maximum cumulative EQD2 was reduced by up to -9.0 Gy for the bronchial tree, -5.8 Gy for the esophagus, -5.3 Gy for the trachea and -5.6 Gy for the great vessel. At the same time, target coverage and lung EQD2 metrics were comparable for both methods. Conclusions: The automated selection of favorable non-coplanar beam orientations may reduce the maximum cumulative EQD2 to critical OARs in challenging thoracic reirradiation cases. This allows to explore either better OAR sparing or dose-escalation in future clinical studies.

Indexed as

Beam orientation optimizationNon-coplanar radiotherapyNon-small cell lung cancerReirradiation

Identifiers

PMID41399698
PMCPMC12701979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.