ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025
Improving reirradiation of recurrent non-small cell lung cancer through non-coplanar beam arrangements.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of Multi-Leaf Collimator Angle Optimization on the Planning Parameters in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Thoracic Tumors.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and purpose: Reirradiation for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is commonly delivered using coplanar techniques. In this study, we investigated whether the selection of favorable non-coplanar beam orientations may limit cumulative doses to critical organs-at-risk (OARs) and thus improve the therapeutic window. Materials and methods: Fifteen cases of challenging high-dose reirradiation for locoregionally recurrent NSCLC were included in this in-silico study. For each patient, the dose distribution from the previous treatment was first mapped to the new patient anatomy using rigid dose registration, and subsequently converted to equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2). A two-arc non-coplanar reirradiation plan was then generated using an EQD2-based direct aperture optimization algorithm, which allows for the simultaneous optimization of dynamic gantry-couch paths and the cumulative EQD2 distribution. Non-coplanar reirradiation plans were benchmarked against two-arc coplanar plans. Results: Considerable reductions of at least 5 Gy in the maximum cumulative EQD2 to critical organs were achieved in 6 out of 15 patients using non-coplanar versus coplanar arcs. In particular, the maximum cumulative EQD2 was reduced by up to -9.0 Gy for the bronchial tree, -5.8 Gy for the esophagus, -5.3 Gy for the trachea and -5.6 Gy for the great vessel. At the same time, target coverage and lung EQD2 metrics were comparable for both methods. Conclusions: The automated selection of favorable non-coplanar beam orientations may reduce the maximum cumulative EQD2 to critical OARs in challenging thoracic reirradiation cases. This allows to explore either better OAR sparing or dose-escalation in future clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.