ArticleJournal of tropical medicine2025
Early Dengue Prediction in Bangladesh: A Comparative Study With Feature Analysis, Explainable Artificial Intelligence, and Model Optimization.
Article in Journal of tropical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in machine learning and Bayesian modeling for tropical disease prediction, diagnosis, and risk analysis: a scoping review.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Early Dengue Prediction in Bangladesh: A Comparative Study With Feature Analysis, Explainable Artificial Intelligence, and Model Optimization.Journal of tropical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dengue fever presents a growing public health challenge in tropical and subtropical regions, where early detection is crucial for effective intervention. This study conducts a comprehensive comparative analysis of 13 machine learning and deep learning models for nonclinical, symptom-based dengue prediction, focusing on the Bangladeshi population. Using a dataset of 500 patient records with 22 symptom-based features, we evaluated a wide spectrum of classifier algorithms, including tree-based (e.g., random forest, extra trees, bagging), linear (logistic regression, SGDClassifier), and an instance-based classifier. Our comparative evaluation revealed that a custom-built, hyperparameter-tuned artificial neural network (ANN) achieved the highest accuracy of 97.5%, significantly outperforming all other models. While tree-based models like random forest also demonstrated strong performance (93.2%), other classifiers showed considerably lower efficacy. To ensure transparency in our top-performing model, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was employed, identifying critical predictors such as retro-ocular pain, swollen eyelids, and age. This study not only establishes the superiority of a well-tuned ANN for this task but also demonstrates the value of broad model comparison and explainability in building reliable diagnostic tools for public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.