ArticleBiochemia medica2026
Key incidents identified by the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs Key Incident Monitoring and Management EQA program.
Article in Biochemia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs (RCPAQAP) Key Incident Monitoring and Management EQA Program (KIMMS) aims to monitor the laboratory quality system's pre- and post-analytical phases. The purpose of this paper is to describe the most common incidents from 2024. Materials and methods: The KIMMS program has four surveys a year, collecting data from the previous three months, with preanalytical and postanalytical incident reporting of 35 incident types. Participants are asked to capture the number of episodes and the number of incidents per quarter of the year. Results: The four 2024 surveys received an average of 111 responses, with 55,329,998 episodes recorded and 1,496,708 incidents identified. The findings from the 2024 program are that the incident "No specimen received" appears to have the highest 80th percentile across the patient sources. The commonest site of error is the Emergency Department (ED), with an 80th percentile overall. Conclusions: The KIMMS data provide valuable, regular and reproducible benchmarking data for the pre- and post-analytical phases of the total testing cycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.