ArticleBiochemia medica2026
Unexpected abnormal flotation of gel separator in tube of post dialysis samples: a case report highlighting the critical role of sampling site selection.
Article in Biochemia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proper preanalytical handling of blood samples is critical to ensure the reliability of laboratory results, particularly in patients undergoing hemodialysis, where biochemical monitoring is essential for assessing dialysis adequacy and guiding treatment decision. We reported three cases of abnormal post-dialysis gel separator flotation in blood collection tubes from patients undergoing hemodiafiltration: in each case, the gel migrated to the top of the tube, with plasma trapped below and blood cells remaining at the bottom. Marked hyperproteinemia and hypercalcemia were observed in the plasma, inconsistent with the patient's clinical status and pre-dialysis values. These findings raised suspicion of a preanalytical error potentially associated with the hemodialysis procedure. On-site investigations conducted in collaboration with the dialysis center for four additional patients, combined with a better understanding of the principles of hemodiafiltration and the potential sampling sites, confirmed that the gel migration anomaly was secondary to unsuitable sampling from the venous line (outflow line) of the dialysis circuit instead of the arterial one (inflow line). In conclusion, we highlighted the critical role of adhering to the appropriate sampling site when performing post-dialysis blood tests: the arterial line was identified as the appropriate site for post-dialysis blood sampling, while the venous line should be reserved exclusively for infusion or reinjection purposes and must never be used for blood collection at the end of dialysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.