ArticleAfrican journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence2025
Paediatric procedural sedation and or analgesia in the emergency unit; A descriptive study of practice at a Ugandan Referral Hospital.
Article in African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Paediatric Procedural Sedation and/ or Analgesia (PPSA) is the recommended standard of practice for children undergoing painful and distressing procedures outside the operating room; however, global practice may vary. In Sub-Saharan Africa, data on the practice of PPSA is lacking. This study aimed to determine the current practice and outcomes of PPSA in the Emergency unit of Mulago National Referral Hospital to inform future standardisation of care. Methods: We conducted a descriptive study from 1st October to 31st December 2023 in the surgical section of the emergency unit of Mulago National Referral Hospital. Data was collected using specifically designed and pretested observational checklists, documenting demographics, pre-procedure assessment and preparation, intra-procedural and post-procedural care, average sedation scores attained, pain control and adverse events observed. Data was coded using EPI-Data and analysed to describe PPSA practice and outcomes. Results: We recruited 183 children undergoing procedures at the surgical section of the emergency unit. Majority were male, 104(56.8 %), and the median age (IQR) was 8 (4-12)years. Most procedures performed were orthopaedic, 149(81.4 %). Only 15(8.2 %) children got both sedation and analgesia, 4(2.2 %) got sedation only while 164(89.6 %) got analgesia only. Propofol was the most used sedative, while lignocaine with paracetamol was the most used analgesia. Most children, 92(50.3 %), had pain scores ≥8, and adverse events occurred in 6(3.3 %), all of whom belonged to the sedation and analgesia group. Anaesthetic officers were the primary providers in 75 % of the sedation-only cases and 46.7 % of the sedation and analgesia group. Conclusion: PPSA practice in this Emergency setting deviates from recommended standards with limited monitoring and inadequate pain control. The clustering of adverse events among children receiving both sedation and analgesia underscores safety risks. Safer sedative choices, clear provider roles, local guidelines, and targeted training are needed to improve the safety and quality of PPSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.