ReviewCureus2025
Early Orthodontic and Orthopedic Interventions for Anterior Open Bite in the Mixed Dentition: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anterior open bite (AOB) is a complex malocclusion prevalent in the mixed dentition, with multifactorial etiology involving skeletal, dental, and habitual components. Early intervention during this developmental stage is advocated to correct the malocclusion and guide growth, but the most effective and stable approaches remain debated. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of early orthodontic and orthopedic interventions for correcting AOB in the mixed dentition. A systematic search was conducted across four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from January 2020 to October 2025. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligible studies investigated children in the mixed dentition treated for AOB with any early intervention. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool were performed independently by two reviewers. A qualitative synthesis was undertaken due to clinical heterogeneity. Eight RCTs were included. All interventions, including bonded spurs, palatal cribs, the rapid molar intruder (RMI), and functional appliances, demonstrated statistically significant overbite improvement, with mean increases ranging from 2.8 to 4.9 mm. The primary mechanism of correction was dentoalveolar, involving incisor extrusion and lingual tipping. However, the RMI produced favorable skeletal changes, such as reduction of the mandibular plane angle, indicating true orthopedic mandibular rotation. One study reported high long-term stability (92.31%) for bonded spurs at a four-year follow-up. Another study found that interventions, particularly those with posterior build-ups, significantly improved oral health-related quality of life. The overall risk of bias was low for most included studies. Early intervention for AOB in the mixed dentition is highly effective. A range of appliances can successfully correct the overbite, primarily through dentoalveolar adaptation, though some can induce positive skeletal changes. Treatment also demonstrates promising long-term stability and improves patient-reported outcomes. The choice of appliance should be tailored to the specific etiology and desired treatment goals. These findings support a proactive interceptive approach in managing AOB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.