ReviewCureus2025
Pseudobulbar Affect: A Network Disorder Linking Emotion, Neurobiology, and Therapeutics.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pseudobulbar affect (PBA), historically described as emotional incontinence, is a neurologic syndrome characterized by sudden, involuntary episodes of laughing or crying that are disproportionate to context and incongruent with mood. Once viewed as a minor behavioral complication of brain injury, it is now understood as a network-level disorder of emotional expression, arising from disinhibition of the brainstem faciovocal apparatus rather than from alterations in emotional experience. This narrative review synthesizes 39 peer-reviewed studies, examining the historical origins, pathophysiology, clinical recognition, and treatment of PBA across neurologic diseases. Classical descriptions by Magnus, Bechterew, and Wilson anticipated contemporary findings, that disruption of cortico-limbic-pontocerebellar circuits, together with neurotransmitter imbalance in serotonergic and glutamatergic pathways, underlie these episodes. Modern neuroimaging and electrophysiologic evidence demonstrate that structural and functional connectivity loss within this network leads to dysregulation of affective output, or emotional dysmetria. Validated instruments, such as the Center for Neurologic Study-Lability Scale (CNS-LS), improve recognition, while pharmacologic therapies, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and dextromethorphan/quinidine (DM/Q), restore inhibitory balance. Conceptualizing PBA as a disorder of expressive control rather than affective tone reframes it as a treatable manifestation of network dysfunction. Future directions include biomarker development, cerebellar-targeted neuromodulation, and integration of standardized screening into neurologic care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.