ArticleCureus2025
Analysis of Neurology Residency Match Outcomes Using the Texas Seeking Transparency in Application to Residency (STAR) Database.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Historically, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 scores played a crucial role in residency selection. However, recent trends have shifted toward a more holistic review process that emphasizes factors such as extracurricular activities and program location in addition to exam performance. Objective This study aims to identify predictors of successful matches into US-based neurology residency programs following the transition of USMLE Step 1 to pass/fail scoring. Design/methods This retrospective study analyzed neurology residency applicant data from the Texas Seeking Transparency in Application to Residency (STAR) database from 2019 to 2024. Following the IRB exemption, variables such as research output, leadership roles, Step 2 scores, clerkship honors, and program signaling were evaluated for their association with successful matches. ANOVA and t-tests were used to determine statistically significant predictors of match success. Results Among 1,017 matched neurology applicants, the mean number of abstracts presented increased from 2018 (4.65) to 2024 (5.63,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.