Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41399566›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Orthopedics on the Rise: Billing Trends Reveal Changing Roles in Spine Surgery.

Graham A Branscom, Leilei Hao, Brendan F Judy, Rebecca Carpenter, David S Casper, John Y K Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Graham A BranscomNeurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Leilei HaoNeurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Brendan F JudyNeurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Rebecca CarpenterNeurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
David S CasperOrthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
John Y K LeeNeurosurgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Spine surgery is a shared domain between neurosurgery and orthopedic surgery, yet the exact differences between the two specialties have not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study is to investigate the differences in procedural volume and the recent trends indicating shifting roles of these two specialties in spine surgery. Understanding these trends is critical for workforce planning, training, and interdisciplinary collaboration. Methods This study analyzed the publicly available Medicare Part B dataset containing procedure-level data from 2013 to 2022. After filtering, we analyzed data from 1,695 and 1,531 spine neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons, respectively. Results Spine neurosurgeons have a higher volume of new patient office visits than orthopedic spine surgeons (median per surgeon from 2013-22: 1015 (IQR: 793.5) vs. 948 (807.8), respectively) (

Indexed as

anterior lumbar interbody fusion (alif)cervical spine proceduresmedicare dataphysician specialtyprocedure volumesspinal deformity correction

Identifiers

PMID41399566
PMCPMC12702474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.