Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41399546›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Evaluating National Imaging Guidelines for Rotator Cuff Assessment After Shoulder Dislocation in Adults Aged 40-60 Years.

Max Moss, Matthieu Durand-Hill, Saneth Sellahewa, Dylan Griffiths, Sanjeeve Sabharwal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Max MossTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Bolton Hospital, Farnworth, GBR.
Matthieu Durand-HillTrauma and Orthopaedics, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, GBR.
Saneth SellahewaTrauma and Orthopaedics, Imperial College London, London, GBR.
Dylan GriffithsTrauma and Orthopaedics, Imperial College London, London, GBR.
Sanjeeve SabharwalTrauma and Orthopaedics, Imperial College London, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRotator cuff tears are a recognised complication of shoulder dislocation. The British Elbow and Shoulder Society (BESS) recommends further imaging via ultrasound (US) or MRI to assess for clinically significant cuff tears in patients aged 40-60 years. This study aims to produce supplementary evidence by assessing cuff tear incidence to help assess the utility of imaging and its impact on resources.

methodsThis was a retrospective observational study to assess imaging and management of patients aged 40-60 years presenting with shoulder dislocation. Data was collected for three years, 2021-2024. The number of patients undergoing MRI/US and the prevalence of cuff tear were collected. Patients were analysed for conservative or operative management.

resultsA total of 148 patients were collected (mean age 49.5 years, SD 6.5). Of these, 68 patients (45.9%) had further cross-sectional imaging via MRI/US, and of the 68 patients, 30 (44.1%) had radiologically reported rotator cuff tears. A total of 116 patients (78.4%) were followed up after dislocation. One patient proceeded to surgery for rotator cuff repair following diagnosis.

conclusionThis study highlights the high rate of imaging-detected rotator cuff tears following shoulder dislocation in patients aged 40-60 years, yet a very low rate of surgical intervention. A more symptom-guided imaging strategy may improve clinical relevance and reduce unnecessary use of advanced imaging resources.

Indexed as

first-time shoulder dislocationmri shoulderrecurrent shoulder dislocationrotator cuff tearsultrasound (u/s)

Identifiers

PMID41399546
PMCPMC12702471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.