ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Beyond the 9 to 5: A Cross-sectional Survey of Adult Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in the United States on Their Initiatives and Resources Based on On-call Model Participation.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Structure, personnel, and initiatives of antimicrobial stewardship programs in pediatric hospitals in the United States based on on-call participation: a cross-sectional survey.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) aim to optimize antimicrobial use through coordinated interventions that improve patient outcomes and reduce adverse events. While guidance exists from organizations including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Infectious Diseases Society of America, recommendations on effort allocation, working hours, and initiatives remain unclear. Methods: This cross-sectional survey assessed the institutional structure, effort allocation, initiatives, and on-call participation of adult ASPs in the United States from September to October 2024. The survey was distributed via email to several ASP-related listservs. Respondents indicating on-call participation were also inquired about working hours, initiatives performed, participants, and compensation. Results: Of 69 responses, most were from academic medical centers (59%) or community hospitals (35%), with 65% covering >500 beds. ASPs were often system-wide (78%) and primarily funded by their respective departments of pharmacy (87%). Common initiatives performed by all ASPs include answering ASP/infectious diseases questions, therapy de-escalation, and prospective audit and feedback. Twenty-four (69%) respondents indicated having an on-call model, with said programs reporting higher median inpatient full-time equivalents (FTEs) for physicians (0.5 vs 0.25) and pharmacists (2.9 vs 1.45) than those without. Commonly performed after-hours initiatives include preauthorization and answering microbiology inquiries. On-call coverage was generally performed during weekend daytimes and holidays, most often by pharmacists. Conclusions: This survey highlights differences in structure, effort allocation, and initiatives of ASPs based on on-call participation. Institutions participating in on-call reported higher FTE assignments for physicians and pharmacists and were more likely to perform time-sensitive initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.