ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2025
Clinical Impact of Mepolizumab on Airway Mucus Plugs in Patients with Severe Asthma.
Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Airway mucus plugs in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: pathobiology, imaging, and implications for clinical trials.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2026Review
- Beyond Eosinophil Depletion: IL-5 as a Context-Dependent Regulator of Airway Immune Networks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Mucus Plugging as a Treatable Trait Across the Asthma-COPD Spectrum: The Role of Type 2 Cytokine Blockade and Quantitative Imaging.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Pro-inflammatory and counter-regulatory modulators of interleukin-5-driven eosinophil programs: a framework for precision medicine in eosinophilic diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Airway mucus plugs are driven by eosinophilic inflammation and considered an important treatable trait in severe asthma. However, whether mepolizumab, an antibody that suppresses the interleukin-5 pathway and eosinophilic inflammation, can remove mucus plugs remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether mepolizumab treatment could reduce the extent of mucus plugs on computed tomography (CT), and whether changes in mucus plugs were associated with changes in symptoms and pulmonary function following the treatment. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included consecutive patients with severe asthma who underwent an asthma control test (ACT), spirometry, and chest CT before and after treatment with mepolizumab at three Japanese hospitals. The mucus plug score (MPS) and total airway count (TAC) were quantified by CT. Results: Thirty-one (15 male) patients were included in this analysis. Their baseline (pre-mepolizumab) median age, ACT, CT-measured MPS, and TAC were 67 years, 19 points, 7 points, and 232, respectively. Baseline MPS was significantly correlated with forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and TAC (R= -0.39 and R= -0.71, respectively). After treatment with mepolizumab (median 466 days later), median ACT and MPS were 23 points and 1 point, respectively, significantly improved from baseline (both P<0.001). Changes in MPS were significantly correlated with changes in ACT and FEV1 (R= - 0.47 and R= - 0.68, respectively). Furthermore, a higher baseline MPS was significantly associated with greater changes in ACT and FEV1 (R= 0.41 and R= 0.47, respectively). Conclusion: In this study, mepolizumab treatment coincided with a decrease in MPS, although a direct causal relationship could not be established. Nevertheless, the observed associations between higher baseline MPS and ACT improvement suggest the potential utility of MPS as a biomarker for biological treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.