Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41399473›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Detection, localisation, and quantification of neutrophils to assess disease activity and early response to therapy in ulcerative colitis: a novel AI-driven model.

Marietta Iacucci, Valentina Vadori, Pablo Meseguer, Irene Zammarchi, Giovanni Santacroce, Rocio Del Amor, Davide Zardo, Brian Hayes, Rory Crotty, Louise Burke and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02589665 (A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Placebo-Controlled Study of LY3074828 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02589665 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Placebo-Controlled Study of LY3074828 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorEli Lilly and CompanyRan2015 to 2019Enrolled249ConditionsUlcerative ColitisArmsMirikizumab, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Marietta IacucciAPC Microbiome Ireland, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Valentina VadoriSchool of Engineering, London South Bank University, London, UK.
Pablo MeseguerInstituto Universitario de Investigación e Innovación en Tecnología Centarada en el Ser Humano, HUMAN-tech, Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain.
Irene ZammarchiAPC Microbiome Ireland, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Giovanni SantacroceAPC Microbiome Ireland, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Rocio Del AmorInstituto Universitario de Investigación e Innovación en Tecnología Centarada en el Ser Humano, HUMAN-tech, Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain.
Davide ZardoDepartment of Pathology, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.
Brian HayesDepartment of Histopathology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Rory CrottyDepartment of Histopathology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Louise BurkeDepartment of Histopathology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Bisi Bode KolawoleSchool of Engineering, London South Bank University, London, UK.
Ujwala ChaudhuriSchool of Engineering, London South Bank University, London, UK.
Silvio DaneseGastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Subrata GhoshAPC Microbiome Ireland, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Valery NaranjoInstituto Universitario de Investigación e Innovación en Tecnología Centarada en el Ser Humano, HUMAN-tech, Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain.
Enrico GrisanSchool of Engineering, London South Bank University, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Histological remission (HR) is a key treatment goal in ulcerative colitis (UC), suggesting better disease management and treatment response. Absence of mucosal neutrophils is crucial to defining HR. However, the role of neutrophil quantity and localisation remains unclear. We aimed to develop a novel AI-driven pipeline to automate neutrophil detection, localisation, and quantification, supporting assessment of HR and treatment response. Methods: We developed an AI-driven pipeline by integrating and combining the outputs of two deep learning models to segment whole-slide images (WSIs) into epithelium, crypts and lamina propria and detect and quantify neutrophils. Optimal neutrophil density cut-offs to assess disease activity in UC patients from the AMAC phase 2 Mirikizumab trial (NCT02589665; 2015-2019) were identified and validated in the multicentre prospective PICaSSO cohort (2016-2019). Cut-offs to determine treatment response at weeks 12 and 52 were also evaluated. Findings: 303 WSIs of UC patients from the multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial of Mirikizumab were analysed. The models yielded a 65.0% DICE Sørensen for region segmentation on average and 82.3% precision for neutrophil detection. A density cut-off Interpretation: This novel AI-based pipeline demonstrates strong potential to detect, localise, and quantify neutrophils to assess histological activity in clinical trials and real-world settings. Furthermore, it effectively stratifies treatment response, offering a reliable and objective framework for personalised UC management. Funding: This paper has been supported by research grants from Eli Lilly and Company.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceHistological remissionNeutrophilsResponse to therapyUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID41399473
PMCPMC12702044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.