ArticleArchives of academic emergency medicine2025
Screening Performance of Stroke Scale for Mid-Level Personnel (SML) in Detecting Acute Stroke with Large Vessel Occlusion: A Cross-sectional Study.
Article in Archives of academic emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The stroke scale for the mid-level personnel (SML) was designed for emergency medical services personnel to predict acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) in both prehospital and in-hospital settings. This study aimed to validate and determine the appropriate cut point of the SML score in this regard. Methods: This single-centered, prospective validation study to assess a novel LVO triage tool was performed in a tertiary care hospital in Bangkok. Patients presenting within 24 hours of onset of acute stroke were included in the study. The scale is designed for mid-level providers and emergency medical services (EMS) personnel including paramedics, emergency medical technicians (EMTs) and emergency department (ED) nurses. LVO was confirmed by brain and neck computed tomography angiography (CTA). Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), likelihood ratios (LRs), and correctly classified instances (CCI) were calculated. Youden's index was used to determine an appropriate cut point of the SML score for LVO prediction. Results: 200 cases with the median age of 64.0 (56.5-73.0) years were included (53.5% female). 83 (41.5%) cases were affiliated to the LVO and 117 (58.5%) to the non-LVO group. The median SML scores for non-LVO and LVO stroke patients were 3 (2 - 3) and 6 (5 - 7), respectively (p < 0.001). The most common presentations in both groups were facial palsy, arm weakness and speech impairment or dysarthria. There was significantly higher prevalence of neglect (8 (6.8%) vs. 5 (4.3%); p < 0.001) and eye deviation (39 (47%) vs. 29 (35%); p < 0.001) in the LVO stroke group than in the non-LVO group. LVO patients scored higher in all categories when compared to non-LVO cases. SML scores of 4 and 5 had the highest Youden's index of 0.82 and 0.67, respectively. SML score of 4 yielded the highest correctly classified instances (CCI) of 90% with sensitivity and specificity of 96.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 89.9-99.3%) and 85.3% (95% CI: 77.6-91.2), respectively. SML score of 4 also achieved the lowest negative LR of 0.04 and an odds ratio of 157 (95% CI: 46.7-521). The AUC of SML in cutoff point of 4 was 0.901 (95%CI: 0.853 - 0.949). Conclusions: SML score may be helpful for mid-level medical providers and also EMS personnel in detecting LVOs since prehospital phase. According to the results, we recommend a cut point SML score ≥ 4 for enhanced sensitivity and NPV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.