ArticleArchives of academic emergency medicine2025
Diagnostic Accuracy of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide for Assessing Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Archives of academic emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is one of the complications of diabetes mellitus that requires rapid and accurate diagnosis. End-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for relevant studies and after screening based on the inclusion criteria, we extracted data. DKA diagnosis in the included studies was based on a composite clinical reference standard, including arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis and ketone testing. We used the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for diagnostic test accuracy studies for quality appraisal. Meta-analysis was performed based on the methods of the Cochrane DTA Handbook using the MetaDTA: Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-Analysis v2.1.3. Results: A total of 13 studies were included in the systematic review, eight of which were proceeding to meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of EtCO Conclusions: The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis show the high sensitivity and specificity of EtCO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.