ArticleAnnals of transplantation2025
Liver Transplantation for Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma: A Retrospective Registry-Based Study Using the Korean Organ Transplant Registry (KOTRY).
Article in Annals of transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) is a rare primary liver tumor with poor prognosis. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and prognostic factors of 40 patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) for cHCC-CC using data from the Korean Organ Transplant Registry (KOTRY). MATERIAL AND METHODS A cohort of 40 LT recipients diagnosed with cHCC-CC was selected from the KOTRY database between 2014 and 2019. Survival analyses were performed according to key clinicopathological variables, and risk factor analyses were conducted for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS During a median follow-up of 21.4 months, 10 patients (25.0%) died and 9 patients (22.5%) experienced tumor recurrence. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 91.8%, 76.2%, and 59.3%, respectively, and the corresponding RFS rates were 88.8%, 70.5%, and 50.2%. Patients with a MELD score <20 (P=0.017) and a single tumor <3 cm (P=0.046) showed significantly better OS. On multivariate analysis, MELD score ≥20 (P=0.04), perineural invasion (P=0.04), and portal vein tumor thrombosis (P=0.005) were independent risk factors for poor OS, whereas microvascular invasion (P=0.01) was an independent risk factor for poor RFS. CONCLUSIONS LT can be a feasible treatment option for patients with early-stage cHCC-CC, providing favorable long-term survival. As most prognostic factors identified were pathology-related, further studies are needed to refine the selection criteria for LT candidates in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.