ArticleBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences2025
[Clinic behavior and therapeutic status of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome].
Article in Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate and analyze the clinical behavior and therapeutic status of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).
methodsPatients diagnosed with APS between September 2021 and October 2025 were enrolled in this investigation. Data collection included: demographic characteristics, disease duration, initial presenting symptoms, departments of first visit and diagnosis, time of the first visit and definite diagnosis, the interval of follow-up, previous and current medications. Assessments using the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36), hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS), and general medication adherence scale (GMAS) were also conducted. Age- and gender-matched healthy controls were selected and completed parallel SF-36 and HADS evaluations during the same period.
resultsIn the study, 196 patients with APS were investigated. The median age of onset was 36 years, the male to female ratio was 1:6.8, and median disease duration was 3.0 years. Rheumatology & Immunology was the most common department for the first hospital visit (33.2%, 65/196), followed by Hematology (21.9%) and Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Center (18.4%). Other departments included Neurology (5.6%), Vascular Surgery (5.1%), and Emergency (4.1%). The median time from symptom onset to APS diagnosis was 6.0 months, with 32.1%(63/196) of patients experiencing a diagnostic delay of over one year. Regarding follow-up adherence, 56.6% (111/196) of patients with APS maintained regular follow-ups at intervals of ≤3 months, while 7.1% (14/196) of the patients visited their doctor less than once a year. The primary pharmacological treatments for the APS patients included hydroxychloroquine, warfarin and other anticoagulants, and antiplatelet agents. According to the GMAS assessment, 76.1% of the patients demonstrated high or good medication adhe-rence. Among all SF-36 domains, the scores of general health (GH) in the APS patients were significantly lower compared with healthy controls (
conclusionIn this study, delayed diagnosis in APS remained prevalent. Compared with healthy controls, the APS patients exhibited significantly impaired physical function and elevated anxiety symptoms. Regular follow-up monitoring should be emphasized, and greater attention must be paid to psychoeducational interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41399073PMC12711406What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.