Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41399048›Full record

ArticleJournal of minimally invasive surgery2025

Comparison of aprepitant, dexamethasone, and ondansetron with dexamethasone and ondansetron for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in high-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries: a randomized controlled trial in India.

Shalini Bala, Tanvi M Meshram, Pradeep Bhatia, Darshana Rathod, Manbir Kaur, Kamlesh Kumari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of minimally invasive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shalini BalaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4403-1895
Tanvi M MeshramDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4625-6357
Pradeep BhatiaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5082-7151
Darshana RathodDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4007-0682
Manbir KaurDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1245-2536
Kamlesh KumariDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9877-4095

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Following laparoscopic surgeries, patients often experience discomfort and dissatisfaction due to postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), despite using a multimodal pharmacological approach. The study compared the effects of triple drug prophylaxis with aprepitant-dexamethasone-ondansetron versus dual drug prophylaxis with dexamethasone-ondansetron in high-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries. Methods: This randomized controlled trial enrolled 201 female nonsmokers who used opioids postoperatively and underwent elective laparoscopic surgery. Patients were allocated into two groups: dual prophylactic antiemetics and placebo (control group), and triple prophylactic antiemetics with preoperative administration of aprepitant 80 mg (group A). Group A received oral aprepitant 80 mg 2 hours before the surgery, and the control group received a placebo. Patients were assessed at two time points: 2 hours after surgery, either in the postanesthesia care unit or in the ward, and 24 hours after surgery in the ward. Results: Patients in group A reported a PONV incidence of 10% as compared to 22.7% in the control group (relative risk,0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-0.89; adjusted Conclusion: The study suggests that prophylaxis with a triple antiemetic regimen consisting of aprepitant-dexamethasone-ondansetron results in a lower incidence of PONV compared with a two-drug regimen using dexamethasone-ondansetron in high-risk patients with three or more risk factors.

Indexed as

AntiemeticsAprepitantLaparoscopic surgical proceduresNeurokinin-1 receptor antagonistPostoperative nausea and vomiting

Identifiers

PMID41399048
PMCPMC12715281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.