ArticleJournal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID2025
Assessing the Right to Interpersonal Relationships, Home and Family for People With Intellectual Disabilities.
Article in Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing the Right to Interpersonal Relationships, Home and Family for People With Intellectual Disabilities.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities recognises in Article 23 the right to marriage, family, parenthood and interpersonal relationships. However, monitoring this right is challenging due to a lack of evaluation tools.
methodThis study presents the psychometric validation of items assessing Article 23, which makes up the interpersonal relationships subscale of the #Rights4MeToo Scale, based on responses from 1215 people with intellectual disabilities, family members and professionals.
resultsThe findings revealed a final unidimensional 7-item structure, high internal consistency, full invariance across gender and partial invariance across respondent types.
conclusionsThis subscale is established as a helpful tool with adequate evidence of validity and reliability for assessing the respect and exercise of this right, with significant implications for support planning and public policy concerning sexual and sentimental relationships, ultimately enhancing the quality of life for people with intellectual disabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.