Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41398949›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Balancing roles and well-being in later life: insights from Chinese older women's life course.

Xinyi Chen, Wei-Jun Jean Yeung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xinyi ChenLee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, 469 C Bukit Timah Rd, Singapore, 259772, Singapore. xinyic@u.nus.edu.
Wei-Jun Jean YeungAgency for Science, Technology, and Research (IHDP, A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore. Jean_Yeung@a-star.edu.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch on productive aging and health has gained increasing attention, yet older women remain understudied—despite often balancing both family responsibilities and economic roles. This issue is particularly salient in China, where women retire unusually early. This research examines the impact of productive aging on the health of Chinese older women, considering opposing hypotheses from the role enhancement/accumulation and role strain perspectives.

methodsUsing longitudinal data from the China Family Panel Studies, this study uses hybrid models to examine how different types and intensities of productive activities influence functional capacities and self-rated health for women aged 55–84. Karlson–Holm–Breen (KHB) mediation analysis further examines the roles of instrumental and psychological pathways.

resultsFindings support the role enhancement/accumulation perspective, showing that multiple and intense productive roles improve health. Women receiving care from children and those with an urban hukou benefit more from productive engagement. Mediation analysis reveals that depressive symptoms and financial support from children partially mediate these effects.

conclusionsThe findings provide nuanced insight into productive aging and health for women in a non-western developing country, where old-age assistance is limited. While Chinese older women demonstrate resilience in balancing multiple roles, enhanced instrumental and emotional support from family may further amplify the health benefits of productive aging.

Indexed as

AgingLife Course PerspectiveAgedAged, 80 and overChinaEast Asian PeopleFamily SupportFemaleHealth StatusHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedPsychological Well-BeingRole ConflictChinese older womenGenderHealthProductive agingRole theory

Identifiers

PMID41398949
PMCPMC12860188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.