ArticleBMC primary care2025
Co-creation of the logic model for a health-promoting school program in vulnerable areas in a Brazilian capital: ProMOVE Escolas + Saudáveis.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Structural imbalance in youth weight management policies in China: a three-dimensional analysis of school responsibility and collaborative support.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough the World Health Organization recommends the Health-Promoting School (HPS-WHO) as a fundamental strategy for health promotion, school-based public health programs grounded in implementation science are still rare, especially in socially vulnerable areas. Considering the co-creation process of the implementation foundations (i.e., logic model, LM) of new interventions is relevant to enhancing acceptability and sustainability in different contexts and resource conditions. We aimed to describe the co-create process of the LM of a school health-promoting program among public schools from socially vulnerable areas in a large municipality in Brazil.
methodsThis study followed the co-creation process of the program's LM considering three main stages: planning, conducting and evaluating, and final validation. The Program's LM was structured based on the Implementation Research LM (determinants, implementation strategies, mechanisms, and outcomes). The planning stage considered five strategies, using theoretical, evidence, and practice-based information. Stakeholders were invited by personal contacts, including researchers, teachers, managers, health professionals, undergraduate students, and recent school graduates. After the thematic analysis and consensus for the first version of the situational analysis and LM's elements, a second workshop was conducted. The final version of the Program's LM was validated by stakeholders who participated in the workshops and approved the version through consensus and scoring.
resultsFour HPS-WHO documents, ten systematic reviews on the implementation of HPS-WHO programs, a survey with 121 stakeholders, eight meetings with school managers, and a 2-h workshop with 17 stakeholders supported the development of the first version of the situational analysis with 35 themes and the Program's LM. The final version of the Program's LM and elements were approved by 13 stakeholders, with scores of 4.7 points or higher. The final LM included 15 determinants, four core strategies, three mechanisms, and three outcome domains.
conclusionsAfter an interactive, multi-strategic, and multi-stakeholder process to co-create the LM, it may be used to guide the implementation and evaluation process of a public health program in all full-time public schools in the fifth most populous municipality in Brazil, in areas with very low Human Development Indexes. This highlights the essential role of cross-sectoral collaboration in strengthening primary health care through school-based strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.