ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025
Key indicators contributing to prolonged emergency department stays in Saudi Arabia: a modified Delphi study.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA prolonged length of stay (LoS) in emergency departments (EDs) is a growing issue that affects patient prognosis, resource allocation, and operational efficiency. In Saudi Arabia, an ED stay exceeding 8 h is considered prolonged; however, few studies have identified the key elements contributing to this issue. This study aimed to determine and rank indicators associated with prolonged LoS in EDs based on the consensus of emergency medical practitioners in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
methodsA two-round modified Delphi study was conducted from September 2024 to January 2025. Purposeful sampling included emergency physicians and nurses (129 in Round 1 and 137 in Round 2). Participants evaluated 34 potential indicators of prolonged ED stays using a Likert-scale questionnaire. Consensus was defined a priori, and the top 10 indicators were reassessed in Round 2. Statistical analysis using SPSS included medians and interquartile ranges (IQR), with significance set at p < 0.05.
resultsA total of 129 and 137 participants completed Rounds 1 and 2, respectively. The most important indicator identified was the percentage of the ED occupied by inpatients. Other highly ranked indicators included the total ED patient count, average time in the ED for admitted patients, and the number of boarding patients. These indicators consistently showed high consensus, with a median (IQR) of 5 (1). Female ED workers rated inpatient occupancy, time between decision to disposition, and boarding patients as higher contributors to prolonged LoS (p < 0.03). ED nurses rated the average time in the ED for admitted patients, consult-to-disposition time, and physician availability as stronger indicators of prolonged LoS in the ED (p < 0.014).
conclusionInpatient boarding, reflected by the percentage of the ED occupied by inpatients and the number of boarding patients, was the primary factor contributing to prolonged LoS in Saudi EDs. These findings emphasize that prolonged LoS in the ED is a hospital-wide challenge requiring coordinated action from healthcare administrators and policymakers to expedite inpatient discharges and optimize ED processes. Enhancing national programs such as Ada’a by incorporating these indicators into performance metrics may improve ED efficiency and patient care in Saudi Arabia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.