Observational studyMedicine2025
Construction and effect evaluation of perioperative nursing model for gastric cancer patients based on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the application effect of the nursing model based on the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the perioperative period of gastric cancer patients, aiming to optimize the nursing process, accelerate postoperative recovery, and improve the quality of nursing care. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 120 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer in our hospital from January 2022 to December 2024. The patients were divided into an observation group and a control group, with 60 cases in each group. The control group received the traditional perioperative nursing model, while the observation group received the nursing model based on the ERAS concept. The 2 groups were compared in terms of postoperative hospital stay, incidence of complications, time to first flatus, time to first out-of-bed activity, patient satisfaction, pain score, and psychological score. The observation group had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay than the control group (7.2 ± 1.5 days vs 10.5 ± 2.1 days, P < .001). The total incidence of complications was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (10.0% vs 26.7%, P = .013). The time to first flatus (24.5 ± 5.2 hours vs 36.8 ± 6.5 hours, P < .001) and the time to first out-of-bed activity (20.3 ± 4.1 hours vs 30.5 ± 5.3 hours, P < .001) were both significantly shorter in the observation group than in the control group. The patient satisfaction score was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (92.5 ± 5.6 points vs 80.2 ± 6.8 points, P < .001). The postoperative pain score was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group, and the psychological score was significantly better in the observation group than in the control group. The nursing model based on the ERAS concept can significantly shorten the postoperative hospital stay of gastric cancer patients, reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, promote the recovery of postoperative gastrointestinal function and the improvement of early mobilization ability, and at the same time, improve patient satisfaction, reduce postoperative pain, and improve psychological status. It has important clinical application value and is worthy of promotion and application in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.