SynthesisMedicine2025
Disentangling the genetic relationship between malignant skin neoplasms and sepsis: Evidence from bidirectional Mendelian randomization.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis, a potentially fatal condition marked by an abnormal immune response, is likewise noted during the development of malignant skin tumors. However, it remains uncertain whether there is a causal link between malignant skin tumors and sepsis. A bidirectional 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was performed utilizing data from the most comprehensive genome-wide association studies on malignant skin neoplasms, involving 218,792 participants, along with genome-wide association studies data from the UK Biobank cohort (N = 486,484; comprising 1896 sepsis cases and 484,558 controls). The inverse-variance weighted method served as the primary analytical approach, complemented by 4 additional MR techniques (MR-Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode) for sensitivity assessments. Heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran Q test. To verify the robustness of the MR findings, a leave-one-out analysis was conducted. The Bonferroni correction was applied to assess the strength of causal associations. Finally, data from the FinnGen study and the UK Biobank cohort were synthesized through meta-analysis. In the primary inverse-variance weighted analysis, genetically predicted malignant skin neoplasms were significantly associated with sepsis (odds ratio = 1.14, 1.12, 1.14, 1.12; 95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.26, 1.01-1.23, 1.04-1.25, 1.01-1.23; P < .001 or P = .03). These results were consistent across sensitivity analyses, and no evidence of directional pleiotropy was observed (MR-Egger intercept: P = .15). Moreover, genetically predicted sepsis showed no causal effect on the development of malignant skin neoplasms. The results of this study suggest that malignant skin neoplasms may be a risk factor for sepsis and could contribute to the progression of the condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.