Observational studyMedicine2025
Postoperative efficacy of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia combined with detrusor underactivity.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the postoperative efficacy of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and detrusor underactivity (DU). A total of 163 patients with BPH who underwent TURP at our hospital were analyzed. All the patients were diagnosed with DU via preoperative urodynamic tests. Based on the Schaefer nomogram assessment of detrusor contractility, patients were categorized into 3 groups: very weak (VW) (n = 30), weak minus (W-) (n = 46), and weak plus (W+) (n = 87). Postoperative outcomes, including International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS), quality of life (QOL) scores, maximum free urinary flow rate (fQmax), voided volume (VV), and post-void residual volume (PVR), were compared with preoperative values 2 weeks after catheter removal. Before surgery, there were no significant differences in IPSS, QOL, fQmax, VV, and PVR between the groups. Postoperatively, improvements were observed in all variables except for PVR in the VW and W- groups. Significant improvements in IPSS, QOL, and fQmax were noted compared to the preoperative values, but VV and PVR changes were not significant. Patients with normal detrusor strength showed greater improvements. TURP effectively enhanced the urinary flow and subjective urinary symptoms in most patients with BPH and DU. Effectiveness varies with detrusor muscle strength, and patients closer to normal strength experience better outcomes. If a ≥5 mL/s increase in fQmax post-TURP was deemed effective, the success rates were 50.0%, 69.6%, and 81.6% for the Valsalva voiding VW, W-, and W+ groups, respectively, with an overall rate of 72.4%. TURP is less effective when the bladder contractility index is <40 to 42.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.