ReviewMedicine2025
Perspective in radiofrequency ablation for benign thyroid nodules: A perspective.
Review in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving radiofrequency ablation outcomes in large thyroid nodules: superiority of adjustable tip needles.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) represents a paradigm shift in the minimally invasive management of benign thyroid nodules (BTNs). By utilizing high-frequency radio waves to generate thermal energy, RFA precisely targets and ablates pathological thyroid tissue, offering a substantial improvement over conventional surgical methods. The procedure minimizes trauma, expedites patient recovery, and significantly reduces postoperative complications. Robust empirical evidence supports RFA's efficacy in reducing BTNs volume while preserving the structural and functional integrity of the surrounding thyroid parenchyma. Technological advancements, such as real-time ultrasound guidance, have enhanced both the precision and safety of RFA procedures. Despite these advancements, gaps remain in the understanding of RFA's optimal implementation. Further research is needed to refine best practices, evaluate long-term therapeutic outcomes, and establish clearer patient selection criteria. The ongoing advancements in RFA not only improve procedural accuracy but also promise better clinical outcomes, thereby increasing its accessibility and comprehension among healthcare providers and patients. This potential for broader clinical adoption positions RFA as a viable mainstream treatment for BTNs. Anticipated future directions encompass the development of innovative RFA devices, the refinement of therapeutic protocols, and the integration of RFA into multidisciplinary treatment models aimed at enhancing efficacy and safety for patients with BTNs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.