Observational studyMedicine2025
A real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA adverse event reporting system events for cefazolin.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Delayed Drug Hypersensitivity: Mechanistic Advances and Emerging Therapies.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cefazolin, a first-generation cephalosporin, is critical for treating infections and preventing orthopedic perioperative infections, but its real-world adverse event (AE) spectrum remains unclear. This study identifies safety signals using data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration AE Reporting System (FAERS). A retrospective pharmacovigilance study analyzed FAERS data (Q1 2004-Q1 2024). Disproportionality analysis was performed using a case/non-case design, calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma poisson shrinker (MGPS) to assess the frequency and disproportionality of AEs. The "cases" were reports listing cefazolin as the primary suspect drug, while the "non-cases" comprised all other reports in FAERS. 1896 cefazolin-related AE reports were included (50.45% male; 45-65 age group dominant). 70.08% occurred within 1 week, mainly "serious events" (39.13%) and "hospitalization" (34.04%). Key SOCs: immune system disorders (488 cases, ROR = 8.72), skin disorders (815 cases, ROR = 2.95), hepatobiliary disorders (137 cases, ROR = 2.7). Significant signals: anaphylactic shock (ROR = 48.37) and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (ROR = 51.8). Critical safety risks of cefazolin are identified, highlighting the need for enhanced AE monitoring. Further research is required to clarify mechanisms and improve safety evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.