ArticleCell communication and signaling : CCS2025
Comparison of human cerebral organoids infected with wild-type Zika versus attenuated DN-2 virus strains uncovers differences in host immune responses.
Article in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Zika virus (ZIKV), a neurotropic virus, poses significant global health challenges because of its ability to cause severe neurological complications and congenital brain abnormalities. Prenatal ZIKV infection impairs early brain development. However, details of the molecular mechanisms driving their virulence remain incompletely understood. Here, we performed comparatively analyses of infection outcomes caused by 2 different ZIKV strains - wild-type (WT) ZIKV versus an attenuated strain (DN-2) - in human cerebral organoids (hCOs) to dissect host responses that could contribute to pathogenicity. Although both viral strains productively infected hCOs with indiscernible gross pathological changes, differences in host responses and subtypes of cells infected discriminate WT ZIKV from DN-2 infections. Single cell RNA sequencing analyses uncovered differently expressed genes (DEGs) that were common to both virus strains, as well as DEGs that were specific to either WT ZIKV or DN-2. For common DEGs, WT ZIKV infections elicited stronger expression of key genes involved in host immune response pathways, such as IFIT2, DDX60, OAS1 and XAF1. Moreover, analyses of WT ZIKV-specific upregulated DEGs uncovered mobilisation of additional innate immune response pathways not found in DN-2. Additionally, while WT ZIKV infected a broad range of cell types in hCOs, DN-2 infections were predominantly limited to radial glial, which are neuroprogenitors essential for neurogenesis. These results highlight that differences in host immune responses and tropism distinguish neurotropic WT ZIKV and attenuated DN-2 infections, underscoring the mechanistic differences involved in pathogenicity. Our study provides further insights into mechanisms used by neurotrophic ZIKV to drive neuropathogenesis during infection of the developing brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.