ArticleBMC oral health2025
Study of zygomaticomaxillary orbital floor complex fractures via endoscopy combined with digital real-time navigation technology.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the effectiveness of endoscopy combined with digital navigation technology in the treatment of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures.
methodsA retrospective controlled study was conducted. The endoscopy combined with digital navigation technology group was defined as the new technology group, and the conventional treatment group was defined as the conventional group. Eight patients were selected from each group. The chi-square test or t test was used to compare the basic conditions, postoperative recovery, and orbital volume between the two groups. Multivariate linear regression was performed to assess independent predictors of postoperative orbital volume difference, including digital navigation technology use, operation time, trauma-to-operation interval, and preoperative mouth opening. Results are presented as regression coefficients (β), 95% confidence intervals, and p-values.
resultsThere were no significant differences in sex, age, injury mechanism, etc., between the new technology group and the conventional group. The fracture reduction fit of the new technology group was better than that of the control group, the postoperative orbital volume was closer to the preoperative orbital volume, and the difference was statistically significant.digital navigation technology use was independently associated with a significant reduction in postoperative orbital volume difference (β = -3.14 ml; 95% CI: -4.09 to -2.18; p < 0.001). No significant associations were found for operation time, preoperative mouth opening, or time from trauma to operation.
conclusionBased on the findings of this study, we believe that endoscopy combined with digital real-time navigation technology can improve the efficacy of surgical treatment for zygomaticomaxillary orbital floor complex fractures, thereby achieving better functional recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.