ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Some subgroups of U.S. childbearing women are still at risk of iodine deficiency in the 21 st century: a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES 2001-2020.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIodine deficiency remains a significant public health issue, especially among women of childbearing age. Assessing iodine nutrition in this population is crucial for the timely prevention of iodine deficiency disorders.
methodsThis cross-sectional and trend analysis utilized data from nine NHANES survey cycles (2001–2020). Urinary iodine concentrations (UIC) were analyzed from 6,828 women aged 14–45 years, categorized into the following subgroups: pregnant (n = 504), lactating (n = 149), and non-pregnant non-lactating women (n = 385). Iodine adequacy was defined using WHO criteria: median UIC of 150–249 µg/L for pregnant women, ≥ 100 µg/L for lactating women, and 100–199 µg/L for non-pregnant non-lactating women. Weighted median UIC, the proportion of individuals below these thresholds, and their respective time trends were assessed using survey-based methods to account for the complex sampling design.
resultsThe median UIC among all women of childbearing age significantly declined from 135.0 µg/L (2001–2002) to 103.5 µg/L (2017–2020), while the proportion of population with UIC < 100 µg/L increased from 37.6% to 47.7%. The median UIC for both pregnant and lactating women fell below the adequate range during 2007–2014 (138.6 µg/L and 70.6 µg/L, respectively) and 2015–2020 (142.8 µg/L and 100.7 µg/L, respectively). Non-Hispanic Black pregnant women and older lactating women (35–45 years) exhibited notably lower median UIC.
conclusionsIodine deficiency persists as a public health concern among U.S. women of childbearing age, particularly among pregnant and lactating subgroups. Continuous monitoring and targeted public health interventions are recommended to ensure adequate iodine nutrition in these high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.